Isn’t it a failure when they leave out a very important part of the story? Isn’t it a failure when the media has their own agenda, instead of being impartial? Isn’t it a failure when the media leaves out a very important part of the story?
- Almost all of the mass shootings (media usually says ) were done by someone with mental illness.
- What part do they leave out?
The media leaves out the part where the shooters, most of them , might have been on psychotropic or other kinds of drugs that some doctors give to some patients who are mentally ill.
The media will not publicize this because the media doesn’t want to get sued by the shooters’ families. And the media doesn’t publicize this because the media’s agenda is to STOP GUN ownership in America. And if the media has to admit that the problem is the drugs, not the guns, then the media’s agenda is in the trash.
SO, the media goes after the guns, after the gun owners , the legitimate gun owners and goes after a highly-respected organization that trains people in gun safety and that helps people defend their rights to own legal guns.
So, while the media is chicken to admit the truth about the mass shootings, the media is loud and outspoken against the NRA, and against the owners of legal guns.
Where’s the outcry against the drugs that are prescribed that admittedly by their own ‘side effects’ reports, admittedly say that suicide might be one of the side effects, that violence or violent behavior might be one of the side effects ?
Want some information?
Then just look here if y0u like